Aramark (ARMK) stock steady after being downgraded at Barclays PLC

Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) shares fell in early trading yesterday lower trade volume than normal after a number of analysts weighed in on the investing value of the stock with a downgraded rating.

U.S. stocks flipped between small losses and gains early Tuesday morning as investors maintained a cautious stance following a sharp postelection rally.

The S&P 500 index SPX, -0.04% was off by about 1 point, or less than 0.1%, at 2,267, with seven of the 11 main sectors trading lower. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -0.13% was off 33 points, or 0.2%, to 19,853.

Meanwhile, the Nasdaq Composite Index COMP, +0.05% traded in record territory, after closing at an all-time high for the second session in a row on Monday.

Analysts at Barclays PLC downgraded shares of Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) from to Equal Weight in a research note to investors today. The company currently has a rating of Equal Weight on the shares. The one-year price target of $39.89 is above the opening price of $34.00, causing a fair amount of other analysts to report on the company recently. Looking back over the last year, Aramark stock has a high of $38.30. Downgrades are more common when analysts consider that the future prospects for the security have diminished from the original recommendation, often because of a considerable and fundamental change in the company’s actions, future vision or industry.

Yesterday Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) shares last traded at $34.41, which is a drop of $0.29 compared to the previous closing price. Opening at $34.00, they fluctuated from $33.57 and $34.54 throughout the day.

Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) now has a market cap of 8.42B.

Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) Average Daily Trading Volume

The stock’s average daily volume is 1,775,140 shares out of a total float 243,092,000 and some 447,346 shares traded hands yesterday, 118 percent below the average. lower than normal. Look for trading volume to pick up in the coming days as swing traders often use swings in trading volume to identify heavy volume accumulation or distribution by institutional investors.

While increased trading for short periods will not mean much will not mean much, however, a trend of heavy trading volume on the buy side over a period of days or weeks sends a positive signal to market traders that institutions may be moving in, so institutional sponsorship is very important.

Institutional sponsorship just refers to ownership of a stock by mutual funds, banks, pension funds and other large institutions.

Institutional investors such as these retain teams of analysts researching thousands of stocks, so it is good confirmation to see them buying a stock you are considering.

Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) Moving Averages

A moving average can also act as support or resistance. In an uptrend a 50-day, 100-day or 200-day moving average may act as a support level, as shown in the figure below.

This is because the average acts like a floor (support), so the price bounces up off of it.

In a downtrend a moving average may act as resistance; like a ceiling, the price hits it and then starts to drop again.

By tracking the activity of these professional investors—and the moving averages they affect—it allows for traders to make more effective decisions on trades.

Trades for Aramark (NYSE: ARMK) have ranged from $29.18 – 38.30, and the stock now has a 50-day MA of $35.59 and 200-day MA of $36.20. Today’s last price is 10.16%% lower than the 52 week high of $38.30.

Earnings growth is an important factor to look at when buying stocks and investors identify companies that have grown their earnings at least 25% or more over the past 3 years.

DISCLOSURE: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not represent the views of the website. Readers should not consider statements made by the author as formal recommendations and should consult their financial adviser before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please see our terms and conditions page.

Latest News

Leave a Reply